Wedding photography sucks

I’ve been de­bat­ing with my­self lately about whether or not I should try to be­come a wed­ding photo­grapher (as in mar­ket my­self as a wed­ding photo­grapher and make that my pri­mary thing), and I’ve come to a de­ci­sion: hell no. I’d use a dif­fer­ent four-​​letter word in­stead of hell but not for this blog. (Hi Mommy, Daddy!)

Banned from this church. Boohoo!

There are too many things I don’t like about wed­ding pho­tog­ra­phy. The only rea­son I even con­sid­ered it is the po­ten­tial for a sta­ble in­come. To be hon­est, wed­ding pho­tog­ra­phy an­noys me. Not wed­dings. I’m okay with wed­dings. But wed­ding pho­tog­ra­phy, ugh…

Look, I don’t even like to take pho­tos of peo­ple smil­ing at the cam­era. They look so fake to me, even when peo­ple are gen­uinely happy. And them be­ing happy doesn’t mean I’m happy, but I still have to smile and pre­tend to be happy. I’m so sick of it. I bet half the time I’m ac­tu­ally smil­ing and frown­ing and grit­ting my teeth at the same time.

And some peo­ple are se­ri­ously rude and/​or in­con­sid­er­ate at wed­dings. At the last wed­ding I shot, dur­ing the cer­e­mony, some­one told me to move be­cause he couldn’t see. Wtf? I was do­ing my fcuk­ing job.

And why is there never a ta­ble re­served for the photo­grapher and video­g­ra­pher at the re­cep­tion? I hate shar­ing a ta­ble with mo­rons who at any­time could spill some­thing on my equip­ment. Or start talk­ing to me.

Wedding pho­tog­ra­phers’ blogs also an­noy me, es­pe­cially when they’re just sales pitches, or sound like sales pitches. Or if they’re just too happy in gen­eral. Or when they say Harry Wang’s dif­fuser is the shit when in fact it’s just shit. Or when the pho­tos look the same. Or when they make ten times more money than me.

I came to the con­clu­sion that if I made wed­ding pho­tog­ra­phy my ca­reer, I would not be do­ing pho­tog­ra­phy for the rea­son I chose it, which is ba­si­cally so I can en­joy do­ing what I do.

Thanks Mike for that screen­cap! It was recorded with his DVX100B. I bet he got some in­ter­est­ing footage.

Edit (9/​28): Hi fredmiranda.com!

15 Responses to “Wedding photography sucks”


  • “i hate shar­ing a ta­ble with mo­rons who at any­time could.…start talk­ing to me” LOL!

    was the priest yelling at you?

  • He was whin­ing like a _​_​_​_​_​.

  • I usu­ally en­joy hav­ing my din­ner with the guests. The video­g­ra­phers, pho­tog­ra­phers and DJ’s at my ta­ble are not very en­ter­tain­ing. Some guests have man­ners and en­gage in won­der­ful con­ver­sa­tion at din­ner. Those with­out man­ners only talk to each other and act like we are not at the table.

  • I didn’t think I’d have to say this but peo­ple shouldn’t take my blog so se­ri­ously. It isn’t in­tended for peo­ple with­out a sense of hu­mor (http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/575499). If you knew me in per­son, you’d know that I don’t think of guests as mo­rons. Only their children.

  • “I don’t even like to take pho­tos of peo­ple smil­ing at the cam­era. They look so fake to me,””

    i know what you mean… I KNOW!

    that fo­rum crackd me up. they take it so se­ri­ous. Now to make a blog about clubs… hah

  • Hmm… What can I say about clubs. Oh the things I have to say about clubs… LOL

  • kinda funny yes.

    saw fo­rum and blog, lol.

    when read­ing blog its ob­vi­ous a bit of tongue in cheek is involved…

  • Now retired…did up to five wed­dings a week.
    learn to do on-​​sight spe­cial shot(s) oth­ers can’t.
    Eat prime rib in kitchen, while wed­ding eats chicken.
    Coll best shot(s) then show um 16x20, at a spe­cial price.
    Consider do­ing only your “spe­cial shots” for other stu­dios on spec­u­la­tion, but only AS FRAIMED PRINTS.

  • Lets hope that priest is not on good terms with G-​​d or you might end up get­ting banned from heaven.

    Weddings are a lot of work and takes more than a $1000 dSLR to pull it off pro­fes­sion­ally. All you’ll do is make a mess of it and have some priest whack you on the head with an al­ter boy.

    BTW, the folks at fred­mi­randa do have a sense of hu­mor. They find you pretty funny.

  • I started my wed­ding pho­tog­ra­phers ca­reer try­ing to catch peo­ple not smil­ing. Now i spend all my time, try­ing to catch em smil­ing nat­u­rally with­out them notic­ing me. It works! It must be the re­portage craze out there at the moment.

  • Ha. I pho­to­graph 50 wed­dings a year. I am bored out my mind. Most of the peo­ple don’t even know what a good photo is, they will like the pho­tos if they like YOU, ie. the per­son­al­ity. I’m so burned out of it I am think­ing of sell­ing my house to down­grade my over­head so I can con­cen­trate of com­mer­cial pho­tog­ra­phy and stock. Yes it pays well, but it’s steal­ing my soul.

  • Wow what a blog­ging site. I can sym­pa­thise with you in re­gards to not get­ting a seat at the wed­ding venue. We have done 14 hrs days and then headed to a $250p/​head venue and we were placed in the cor­ner with the DJ with no chair. Lucky the brazil­ian wait­resses were awe­some! lol.. Have placed a high­lited note in the con­tract for us to be FED! Not ask­ing for to much i sup­pose. Yes wed­ding pho­tog­ra­phy has its ups and downs! Very good in­come and beats work­ing as a labourer or re­tail as­sis­tant. Cheers guys!

  • I know this thread is kinda old now but I would just like to point out something.

    DICK SERA
    Now retired…did up to five wed­dings a week.
    learn to do on-​​sight spe­cial shot(s) oth­ers can’t.
    Eat prime rib in kitchen, while wed­ding eats chicken.
    Coll best shot(s) then show um 16×20, at a spe­cial price.
    Consider do­ing only your “spe­cial shots” for other stu­dios on spec­u­la­tion, but only AS FRAIMED PRINTS.

    This only fur­thers the thought of wed­ding pho­tog­ra­phy be­ing a life­less, in­side the box process with money hun­gry in­di­vid­u­als mak­ing up the ma­jor­ity. I guess all the years of learn­ing how to do all those on-​​sight “spe­cials shots” has fried the spelling por­tion of your brain. Fraimed? Um? Seriously? And who have you been side by side with that you just blew away with your quick adap­tion to spe­cial scenes and sent him pack­ing up his gear? Oh, I’m sure oth­ers can’t learn how to do the shots you can, oth­er­wise you would be able to search wed­ding photo­grapher and see over a hun­dred pop up in your same zip code. Oh wait, I can with the same generic re­sults. It’s a good thing wed­ding pho­tog­ra­phy and es­pe­cially your­self are so su­pe­rior. The av­er­age wed­ding guest knows ex­actly what good pho­tog­ra­phy is. I envy you.

Leave a Reply